Because @Adam_Murdough asked for it and it's really slow at work today, I don't have anything better to do. So let the great debate of all debates begin! What is funnier people...monkeys or chickens?
That’s a toughie. On the one hand, monkeys throw poop. On the other hand, chickens are really dumb, and they have that jerky movement. But, then, monkeys are just enough like humans to reflect our foibles and affectations, but different enough that we can feel superior at the same time.
My initial reaction was to vote for monkeys...but with more though it was clearly chickens. Nobody ever busts out a rubber dead monkey for a comedy act. People would not find that funny. Chicken wins because they are not endearing at all. We can remorselessly mock them and almost never feel bad.
My initial reaction was to vote for monkeys...but with more though it was clearly chickens. Nobody ever busts out a rubber dead monkey for a comedy act. People would not find that funny. Chicken wins because they are not endearing at all. We can remorselessly mock them and almost never feel bad.
Ah, but this is precisely why chickens are not as funny. People love to mock other people to make themselves feel better. The monkey acts as a stand-in for the people you want to mock but can't for fear of public admonishment.
Monkeys have teeth, chickens don't. Teeth are funny. Think of all the comedy that comes from teeth - chattering teeth, those "bubba" teeth that you can put in your mouth (like vampire fangs, but not, because fangs = not funny), even that recent dog food commercial that starts out as an ad for doggie dentures (the commercial promotes dental health for dogs).
Teeth are funny.
Monkeys win.
Now, if chickens develop teeth, then we have a whole new discussion.
Thank you for reading this installment of "He actually spent time thinking about that?!?" Join us next time for another barely logical and highly suspect rant.
I will give you, I say, I will give you Foghorn Leghorn, but monkeys are still funnier overall. Now, when we say “monkeys,” I’m including apes, because, let’s face it, most Americans don’t make a distinction between the two, especially when it comes to entertainment.
@Adam_Murdough, in today’s podcast you seemed a little down about monkeys being so overwhelmingly in the lead in this poll. I have a sneaking suspicion that your preference for chickens is due to the fact that chickens make better Muppets. I don’t deny it, and it is a strong point. But as difficult as it may be to believe, there is more to comedy than what the Muppets can offer. So let me appeal to your love of language and literature as I try to convince you of monkeydom’s superiority.
Consider if you will these two phrases: “Are you calling me a chicken?” and “Are you trying to make a monkey out of me?” Our society has equated the chicken with the basest and most despicable of attributes—cowardice. The monkey, on the other hand, is equated with being something to laugh at.
The greatest monkey character in literature has to be Sun Wukong, a.k.a. Monkey from Journey to the West. Monkey is the prototypical trickster hero—clever and light-hearted, and a hero besides. And in some versions, the book itself is a satire of the Chinese government. Here the monkey is providing humor on two levels. Meanwhile, the best known chicken character in literature is Chicken Little, who is nothing more than a fool. And not the court jester type of fool, but [SPOILER ALERT] the kind of fool who leads his friends to their deaths.
So who’s funnier, light-hearted trickster heroes you can laugh at, or cowardly fools who will lead you to your doom?
I will give you, I say, I will give you Foghorn Leghorn, but monkeys are still funnier overall. Now, when we say “monkeys,” I’m including apes, because, let’s face it, most Americans don’t make a distinction between the two, especially when it comes to entertainment.
I will give you, I say, I will give you Foghorn Leghorn, but monkeys are still funnier overall. Now, when we say “monkeys,” I’m including apes, because, let’s face it, most Americans don’t make a distinction between the two, especially when it comes to entertainment.
Comments
Plus, they throw poop.
Poop wins.
Nobody ever busts out a rubber dead monkey for a comedy act. People would not find that funny.
Chicken wins because they are not endearing at all. We can remorselessly mock them and almost never feel bad.
Monkeys have teeth, chickens don't. Teeth are funny. Think of all the comedy that comes from teeth - chattering teeth, those "bubba" teeth that you can put in your mouth (like vampire fangs, but not, because fangs = not funny), even that recent dog food commercial that starts out as an ad for doggie dentures (the commercial promotes dental health for dogs).
Teeth are funny.
Monkeys win.
Now, if chickens develop teeth, then we have a whole new discussion.
Thank you for reading this installment of "He actually spent time thinking about that?!?" Join us next time for another barely logical and highly suspect rant.
Cartoon I did a while back which I thought might be relative to this thread.
But I contend Chickens are FUNNIER.
You say, “Ain’t Nobody Here But Us Chickens,” I say, “I Wanna Be Just Like You.”
You say Super Chicken, I say Mojo Jojo.
You say, “Love Without Anger,” I say, “Everybody’s Got Something to Hide Except for Me and My Monkey.”
You say, “In the Mood,” I say, “The Monkey Song.”
Consider if you will these two phrases: “Are you calling me a chicken?” and “Are you trying to make a monkey out of me?” Our society has equated the chicken with the basest and most despicable of attributes—cowardice. The monkey, on the other hand, is equated with being something to laugh at.
The greatest monkey character in literature has to be Sun Wukong, a.k.a. Monkey from Journey to the West. Monkey is the prototypical trickster hero—clever and light-hearted, and a hero besides. And in some versions, the book itself is a satire of the Chinese government. Here the monkey is providing humor on two levels. Meanwhile, the best known chicken character in literature is Chicken Little, who is nothing more than a fool. And not the court jester type of fool, but [SPOILER ALERT] the kind of fool who leads his friends to their deaths.
So who’s funnier, light-hearted trickster heroes you can laugh at, or cowardly fools who will lead you to your doom?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpoki4wBwtA