Listening to the CGS re-run episode of the Spotlight on Superman in the Silver Age, I have a question for Murd. Rather than post it on the feedback for the re-run, I figured I'd post it here since I wouldn't mind everyone else hopping in with their perspectives.
In the episode it was mentioned that Superman (that Action Ace) changed to fit the times (for the most part). The Golden Age Superman was a reflection of the times. The Silver age went more sci-fi as pop culture went that way as well. And so on and so forth.
So my question to Murd (and you fine folks): How have comics changed to reflect the current state of our culture? When people look back on this "era" of comics (like we look back on the Golden and Silver ages), what are they going to see about the comics we're currently reading that reflect the "sign of the times"?
0 ·
Comments
But that’s what American culture has had on its collective mind since 9/11, if not slightly before. It’s what we see on the news every day with the continuing destabilization of the Middle East. There’s also a growing feeling of “us vs. them” within our own country as both the political divide and economic divide are becoming increasingly larger and more difficult to bridge. Trust in the government is at all-time lows (for our lifetimes at least). And so many of the “heroes” we thought we could rely on—Lance Armstrong, countless Olympic athletes and baseball stars—turn out to be cheaters and liars, if not worse.
With all of this constantly barraging our everyday lives, is it any wonder that Superman is now breaking necks?
I'm looking at 'Man of Steel', 'Dark of the Moon', 'Star Trek: Into Darkness', etc.
It seems, on the one hand, to be a progression of the level of destruction and death that modern people see as "disaster". On the other, it seems to be a morbid and cruel joke.
IDK, I'm only 26. So either my perceptions are starting to drift off early into the "get off my lawn" crowd, or things really ARE so bad out there that they're even disgusting today's youth.
On a closely related note, I think this "era" will also be remembered for a major jump in the gradual, decades-long shift in the target demographic for comic books from children/young teens to adult males. In addition to the societal factors Eric and I mention above, comics have gotten "darker" because the major publishers are finding it more profitable to market their wares to a "mature audience" of older readers (primarily men) who are believed (accurately or not) to want more sex and bloodshed and angst and grueling intrigue in their entertainment, and who, more importantly, have more disposable income to spend on comics than would an All-Ages/youth audience (whom comics have been steadily losing to other entertainment media for years anyway). Future volumes of comics history, in chapters devoted to the 2000s/2010s, will probably cite the already-infamous "DC makes comics for 45-year-olds" anecdote, along with Joe Quesada's belief, as stated in an interview a few years ago, that young readers are "a myth."
I'll also throw out there the vogue for adapting the visual style and narrative techniques of comics to the conventions of other, higher-profile visual media, such as blockbuster movies (hence the "widescreen" storytelling style popularized in comics by artists like Bryan Hitch over the past decade or so) and THE emergent entertainment medium of the early 21st century, video games. Future historians may take note of that, too.