Kirby Is Here!!! We're 'Krackling' with excitement to present Part One of our two-part tribute to the King of Comics, in celebration of his centennial year. Kirby Konnoisseur Chris Eberle walks us through Jack's early life, his marriage, his service in World War II, his storied creative partnerships with Joe Simon and Stan Lee, and the triumphs and trials of his career in comics from the early Golden Age to his exit from Marvel in 1970.
https://youtu.be/HtFryzJy76cSweet, sweet video returns, and you can also listen
here!
Comments
Unfortunately, I'm not as big a fan of Kirby's later career, which makes me a bit more ambivalent about listening to Part 2. Oh, I'll listen...I have faith that Chris will be as fair minded as he was for part 1....but knowing what I already know about the twilight of Kirby's career, with all of its tales of persecution, accusations, finger pointing, and "someone done Kirby wrong" songs...it's going to be bittersweet. But that's history, folks....learning the good AND the bad of a person's life or period of time. However, as bad as things got for Kirby those last few decades, I choose....and I suspect Chris will choose....to focus instead upon the transcendent power of the man's creative work. He may have failed as a savvy entrepreneur and "brand manager" (in today's parlance), but he sure made up for it as a consummate craftsman and creative dynamo.
God bless you, Jack!
Chapeau, gentlemen, chapeau.
A few notes:
Yes, Kirby hated being an in-betweener, but the impetus for him leaving Fleischer Studios was the unrest among the staff at the studio, and Kirby didn't want to get mixed up in a strike. He didn't think the job he had there was worth that, so he got out. Fleischer ended up moving their operations to Florida not long after, and I can’t imagine that Kirby would have made that move, so he would have left sooner or later either way.
Re: the creation of Spider-Man, the Kirby Collector has discussed the issue multiple times (sorry, I can’t remember which issues exactly), most recently in issue #66. There are no firm conclusions, obviously. Personally, I think Kirby was involved in some way in the process of the development of the character, but had little to no input of notable significance, outside of possibly the name, in the character as we know it. And the name wasn’t exactly a leap of ingenuity either, given there was a Spider Queen in 1941, a Spider Widow in 1942, a Spider Woman in 1943, Dr. Bio and his Spider-Men in 1945, etc., etc. As far as I'm concerned Spider-Man is a Ditko and Lee creation. And, I think I've mentioned this before, but I'm pretty much with you on the two-thirds Kirby, one-third Lee assessment in most cases.
Re: Stan Lee, could he have done more to support Kirby? Probably, but not necessarily. I mean, Neal Adams did more to help the financial status and rights of comic book artists than Stan ever did, and he was only a freelance artist himself, not the face of a company. But Neal had the advantage of timing with Superman: The Movie and the huge wave of publicity that brought on his side, and Lee (before Kirby’s death) did not. But did Lee really even try? Nope. No way he wanted to rock that boat—that gravy boat, that is. Lee got his golden parachute, and Kirby got screwed. Part of that is on Kirby, but the vast majority of it is on Goodman, and Cadence, and Jack Schiff, and Harry Donenfeld, and Kinney National, and on, and on, and on... even Joe Simon kind of screwed him in the end, whether intentionally or not. As you guys said, most (but certainly not all) of the first comic book publishers and packagers (not to mention the distributors) were crooks and swindlers.
And, yes, as Mark said above, Kirby towards the end of his life released all the pent up anger in a way that often misrepresented the facts. But I can’t really blame the guy, because he did get screwed badly throughout his life, just not always in the way he described it. I sometimes wonder what the comics industry would be like today (assuming it would still be around) if Kirby had unleashed some of that anger at Goodman just a few years earlier, say, while drawing that first Silver Surfer story.
While I do think it's very important to remember him primarily for his amazing creative output and accomplishments, we should also always remember his setbacks and mistreatments. I don't believe the latter undermines the former, and it shouldn’t. In fact, I think those mistreatments fueled him in a lot of ways—along with his childhood in the tenements and his experiences in the war (there’s no way of knowing for sure, but I believe he probably suffered from some level of PTSD).
However, as I suggested, Kirby's influence also lives on in another, less obvious way: the lessons learned from his professional misfortunes have lead to real and lasting reforms for creatives. Over the last several decades, the larger publishers have instituted better working conditions and more equitable financial arrangements...not in a perfect or all-encompassing way...but better nonetheless. Beyond that, new publishing models have emerged, most significantly Image Comics. Say what you will about its early years or its founders, but a quarter century later, its charter philosophy of complete creator control is thriving and yielding incredible new possibilities in comic book storytelling. In fact, it's become successful to the point of doing real damage to the big legacy publishers, perhaps Kirby's ultimate "revenge". Knowing the history with Kirby and so many others, creators no longer share their best new characters and concepts with Marvel or DC, opting instead to save them for their own creator-owned projects. This has forced the Big Two to keep using the same (or slightly tweaked) characters over and over and over again (much like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic), becoming centers of endless repetition and low innovation. As an aside, I wonder what Kirby thought about Image as it emerged in the early 90's? That's something I'd love to learn more about in Part 2. I can imagine Kirby being pleased to see creatives taking charge of their careers and creations in a way he never could, learning from his generation's mistakes and making a better future for intensely motivated writers and artists. In this way, Kirby's many professional slights and frustrations at least helped to serve some greater good for the generations after him.
Me: Same.
It's interesting to think about, but probably wouldn't have been possible.
Side note: I love how when Chris comes to some obscure comic or comic character, he seamlessly swings it over to @Adam_Murdough for further explanation. It's like Murd is Chris' very own, personal Wikipedia (or, "Murdipedia," which I may start referring to him as, from now on)
Btw, is it just me or did anyone else have Kubby going through their head?
Can't believe Hollywood haven't made his life into a movie. It's certainly worthwhile.
Otherwise love this episode and the follow-up. Thanks for this awesome content and reference point in the history of the medium.