Just finished watching "Superman Vs the Elite" and really liked it. A lot of reviews I saw complained about the animation and Supes' Leno-esque chin. I quite liked the animation. As for the story, it was what I remember of the comic (and that's actually not much. I'm planning on re-reading it here soon). The issue here is, "should heroes kill?" Does the end justify the means? Is Superman and his ideals antiquated nonsense?
So what did you think? Have you read the comic? How did the movie compare?
0 ·
Comments
On the topic of Heros killing, I have no problem with it so long as the circumstances are right and its justified. Murder no. Use lethal force when Nec. ok. Superman is kindve the exception... he should not kill (as a charecter/icon/symbol) but I can imagine circumstances where it would be acceptable for even him. For example, in the real world Atomic Skull would have proven himself too dangerous to live and I wouldve considered Superman a hero had he killed him. I suspect most reasonable people would agree. However; Superman frying a fleeing purse snatcher or the Elite slaughtering a stuborn politician is not honorable, heroic or justifiable. There is a huge, distinct and obvious difference between the methods and motives of the Elite and those of Superman.
Superman, IMO, HAS to be the big blue boy scout because if he isn't that character gets really scary, really fast. See Mark Waid's Irrdeemable, or JMS'S Supereme Power, or Omni Man in Kirkman's Invincible etc. etc. etc. there are a lot of corrupt superman analogs out there. This was actually part of my beef with Superman Returns, you have Supes as a deadbeat dad, peeping Tom spying on a family while hovering outside their house. That is some creepy dark side of the force shit!
I'm ranting aren't I? Sorry.
I stopped being distracted by the animation, and appreciated it, after five minutes.