I didn't know how many others have seen this but it's going around DeviantArt and I thought I'd post it to make people aware who haven't heard about it.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/117533-London-Art-Expo-Vendor-Accused-of-Image-TheftUs artists have to stick together. My question / thought is: I know what this guy is doing is morally wrong. I think it's despicable and I hear it happens all the time all over the world, taking credit for someone's work that he didn't create but when an artist illustrates something using another's licensed property what kind of action can they take? The artist doesn't own the property so do they have any legal rights to the image? Besides bad mouthing the guy and putting a watermark on the image what else can an artist do?
What thoughts does everyone else have?
Comments
After reading the article I wonder though how someone can sell stuff at a Art Expo without any ID in the first place :-?
Personally I don't go the watermark route, it cheapens the image and with stuff like Photoshop's content aware fill it is barely a deterrent. What I never do it put anything online in high DPI (never above 72) nor do I post very large resolution images so that at most a 4x6 could be printed with any clarity. It sucks but that is what I have found as the best option.
It seemed like that approach made a difference in the case of Rob Granito, and maybe it will in this one as well.
This is a change of mediums, but the question of how to police the pirating of another artists' work when they are in a legal grey area to begin with reminded me of an excellent segment that NPR's On the Media did about intellectual property enforcement and comedians. Given that there is not (I think) settled law about protecting the ownership of jokes told onstage, comedians have to resort to social pressure within their community to police such theft, and some professors studied it. For those interested in such a wonkish subject, you can find the segment and transcript here.