Wow.
http://www.dccomics.com/blog/2012/07/11/announcing-a-new-writer-for-he-man-and-the-masters-of-the-universe This is bizarre for a short mini after one issue that just came out! I hated issue #1 for a number of reasons but I don't think this move is a good sign at all. I'd love to know the full story behind this, hopefully it comes out.
Comments
Matthew
But you shouldn't touch a licensed property unless you have done enough research for it or unless you have a good working history of it to begin with. Seems very strange that they would cut him after a single issue. Though they would have put the comic off until they could get a writer more familiar. Didn't an editor somewhere check this beforehand?
Regardless of anyone's familiarity with He-Man, how in the F does anyone think throwing a razor sharp woodsman's ax away for a stick makes any sense? I got the book for free and was so entirely disappointed I gave it back. I just can't agree @Nick, there are more important things than money... like actually caring and doing good work.
A strong He-Man book for guys of a certain age (e.g., my own) is a big, meaty softball. Imagine He-Man with the IDW/Andy Schmidt treatment that G.I. Joe got? I would have eaten that up.
And for Robinson to claim ignorance of the material is no excuse. Not only does it make us, as the would-be readers, just wish that they chose one of the many, many creators who grew up with this material for the gig (Tim Seeley immediately comes to mind), but then there is the Internet. Given how much fan-curated information is to be had online, I would imagine a writer could get up to speed in a weekend. People doing work-for-hire gigs probably do that for long-lived superheroes all the time, there is no reason not to do the same for a licensed gig. Especially knowing that the audience will be just as ravenous and on top of things. Even more so, actually, when it comes to a property that hasn't been heard from in awhile.
Sadly, as the missus and I are both big He-Man fans, I'll likely still pick this up. I really feel for poor Giffen. Seems he's the "firefighter" for books these days. "Hey Keith! So and so celeb artist/writer dropped the ball on this title...come in and do your magic on it, m'kay?"
Even like Habibi from Craig Thompson (whom I love) you could tell was just out of his actual realm of knowledge and no amount of research can cover for that. There are so many writers/artists that are familiar with any license/hero/etc. that it just doesn't make sense to have one cram to write for a book.
I'm not saying money is everything, but I'm guessing most creators would take most work, even if they weren't steeped in the history prior to working on the book. Also how do you know he doesn't care? Maybe he really tried and just didn't have a good book. I'm not saying this particular one is good or bad, but sometimes stuff just isn't good, doesn't mean he didn't care or try.
I always liked the Dolph Lundgren movie better... (cringes for backlash)
I remember walking into the movie theater just as the credits from the previous showing were ending:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6hCCPCkIg4
freaked me out!!! I think that was the first post-credit scene that I ever saw.
If the ever did another live action MotU movie, wouldn't it be awesome if the first thing Skeletor said would be "I told you that I'd be back" regardless whether it was a reboot or not.
That all said, there's no excuse for not doing research. I agree with David, this project should have been a Tim Seeley book, and I remember saying that when it was first announced. It's basic though. You get handed a project, then you research it. Should be easier than it seems to have been.