Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

DC Animated to start being New 52 Only....

iO9 has the story.

Flashpoint Movie to kickoff Animated New 52

Goodbye Bruce Timm universe. Goodbye classic story lines. Said to be all new, all the time. Next movie is tr first arc of Justice League.

I wish instead of doing this, they had started a "New 52" line of novizations. Oh wells...
«1

Comments

  • Options
    David_DDavid_D Posts: 3,881
    edited July 2013
    I don't see them confirming that it will ONLY be the New 52.

    I think the blog piece ends with a question that has a false premise- 'which classic DC saga are you sad to not see animated?'. Clearly he is tryi g to bait some response and outrage, since that is the currency of most people that blog or report about comics.

    But look at that quote from someone who works on these: 'there may be some exceptions'. To me, they are highlighting/marketing the connectivity between the Flashpoint feature and Justice League:War. But I don't think they are actually saying they are closing the door or doing pre-New 52 stories. Having a Flashpoint feature that kicks off other New 52 features to increase connectivity is not the same thing as them saying "only New 52 from now on".

    Edit- looking at the quotes in the story again, it may be that there is more connectivity in the look of the characters, and clearly they are taking this opportunity to switch to a new (likely cheaper) voice cast. And those might be consistent across the various features (and casting continuity is likely the thing Romano would best be in a position to talk about more than from what era the stories come from). And the director of Flashpoint makes it clear the end of his feature is a lead-in to War. But I don't think that all amounts to the summation that Bricken makes that all older stories are now off the table.

    As usual, he chose the interpretation that would most provoke the longtime fans, as he knows that New 52 pushing out "classic" stories is sure to get shared and commented on. But the quotes he is working from don't go that far.
  • Options
    tazmaniaktazmaniak Posts: 733
    edited July 2013
    The thing is, if you read the article, it has no new information in it. The article's author says they're setting up the animated New 52 universe and will only be using those stories in the future, but nowhere in the article does he cite any sources backing up that claim. He does link to a statement from Andrea Romano, but she doesn't say they're adapting New 52 stories. She says the future movies may all be set in the same continuity, which wasn't the case for the movies up to this point. That's actually something fans have been wanting.

    We know for a fact the upcoming films won't be all based on New 52 stories. Only one of the three films in 2014 will be. The other two are based on a 2006 Batman comic and supposedly the Arkham games.

    Like James Tucker recently said, The Flashpoint Paradox will sort of work like Flashpoint did in the comics. Flashpoint ushered in a new continuity, while The Flashpoint Paradox will usher in a new direction for the animated films as the torch is passed from Timm to Tucker. But, the new films will not be explicitly based on any New 52 stories. He said you might see new costumes and designs that mirror the current comics, but they're still going to be pulling from the decades of DCU material that they've always pulled from. I've seen no evidence otherwise. Again, look at the line-up for 2014. Maybe some will be based on these new stories, but not all of them. I said it in another post, and I'll say it here. WB puts out 3 animated films per year. There simply aren't enough worthy storylines in the New 52 for them to be able to turn out 3 movies based on them each year.
  • Options
    Mr_CosmicMr_Cosmic Posts: 3,200
    tazmaniak said:


    There simply aren't enough worthy storylines in the New 52

    Yeah, I hope the animation team isn't holding their breath.
  • Options
    Chuck_MelvilleChuck_Melville Posts: 3,003
    Mr_Cosmic said:

    tazmaniak said:


    There simply aren't enough worthy storylines in the New 52

    Yeah, I hope the animation team isn't holding their breath.
    I'm not holding mine.
  • Options
    MattMatt Posts: 4,457
    I'm so glad they did Flashpoint with JL: War on the horizon. IF they're going to start a more n52 look & feel I can save lots of time by no longer watching these productions. Thanks DC!

    M
  • Options
    batlawbatlaw Posts: 879
    oh boy oh boy oh boy... the potential and oportunities are endless! Just imagine! :))
  • Options
    PlaneisPlaneis Posts: 980
    Matt said:

    I'm so glad they did Flashpoint with JL: War on the horizon. IF they're going to start a more n52 look & feel I can save lots of time by no longer watching these productions. Thanks DC!

    M

    Ouch.

    I don't mind the N52 look and feel. But I don't feel like they HAVE to adapt the storylines just because. They should be free to make their own cartoons, in the style and similar continuity of the N52
  • Options
    CaptShazamCaptShazam Posts: 1,178
    Nick said:

    I'm starting to notice that DC talk is starting to be like Alan Moore talk. People ask Alan Moore all the time about Watchmen, then he gets upset and people get all up in arms over it again and again like it's something new. If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    I agree with you to a point. There is a point where we just have to get over our dislike of the N52 and move on. And there is a lot of talk just done to create more talk and argument.

    The problem is, for those of us who have been reading comic for decades (I am at around 29 years reading comics) and have loved the previous versions of the DC universe and devoted so much time and money to it, it is hard to just move on and be quiet when we see what we believe to be an inferior product being produced.
  • Options
    MattMatt Posts: 4,457
    Nick said:

    I'm starting to notice that DC talk is starting to be like Alan Moore talk. People ask Alan Moore all the time about Watchmen, then he gets upset and people get all up in arms over it again and again like it's something new. If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    I guess to clarify, when I make responses/posts like my last one, I'm not trying to get things back to pre-n52. I'm not a fan of n52, but the last couple years of o52 wasn't interesting me either. I've voiced my opinion with my wallet. I concur (as a former Howard Stern fan), if you don't like something, just don't listen/watch/read it. Let those who do enjoy it continue to.

    Now, as for these movies, I'd consider at least watching Flashpoint (since I didn't read it), but I see they kept the same BS Batman ending in it that prevented me from reading the series after it was over to begin with!

    M
  • Options
    PaulPaul Posts: 169
    David_D said:

    I don't see them confirming that it will ONLY be the New 52.

    I think the blog piece ends with a question that has a false premise- 'which classic DC saga are you sad to not see animated?'. Clearly he is tryi g to bait some response and outrage, since that is the currency of most people that blog or report about comics.

    Whaaaaat?!? Are you suggesting that a loose connection to facts and unfounded half-cocked emotional reactions paired with incendiary link bait are the stock in trade of comics bloggers (yeah, I can't bring myself to actually call any of it "reporting")?!?

    But look at that quote from someone who works on these: 'there may be some exceptions'. To me, they are highlighting/marketing the connectivity between the Flashpoint feature and Justice League:War. But I don't think they are actually saying they are closing the door or doing pre-New 52 stories. Having a Flashpoint feature that kicks off other New 52 features to increase connectivity is not the same thing as them saying "only New 52 from now on".

    Edit- looking at the quotes in the story again, it may be that there is more connectivity in the look of the characters, and clearly they are taking this opportunity to switch to a new (likely cheaper) voice cast. And those might be consistent across the various features (and casting continuity is likely the thing Romano would best be in a position to talk about more than from what era the stories come from). And the director of Flashpoint makes it clear the end of his feature is a lead-in to War. But I don't think that all amounts to the summation that Bricken makes that all older stories are now off the table.

    As usual, he chose the interpretation that would most provoke the longtime fans, as he knows that New 52 pushing out "classic" stories is sure to get shared and commented on. But the quotes he is working from don't go that far.
    Hey, at least he included the full Romano quote. Usually the trick is to exclude anything which proves their thesis incorrect, so I'll give him credit for that if nothing else.
  • Options
    PeterPeter Posts: 470
    edited July 2013
    Nick said:

    I'm starting to notice that DC talk is starting to be like Alan Moore talk. People ask Alan Moore all the time about Watchmen, then he gets upset and people get all up in arms over it again and again like it's something new. If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    Exactly. I find it very telling that David D started a thread about Trinity War and had to put in the disclaimer that it was a thread about discussion, not griping. I also find it telling that some posters would rather beat a drum than start a thread about something they ARE enjoying. Better to defend your position to the death, I suppose, even if that means keeping other posters away for fear of retaliation. Forums are always at their best when the negative nancys were allowed their gripe, patted on the head and then skipped over. After awhile of no one falling into their dark circle, they would eventually fade away. If someone is acting like their voice demands to be heard, or that they have some sort of right to constantly bitch, just don't engage them. If they respond? Don't respond back. They'll get the hint.

    To the topic of the thread, it makes sense. Even after the original Crisis, toys and promotional materials still kept some of the pre-Crisis imagery. The same will happen with the new movies. After some thought, it hit me that, even though some have said the new Man of Steel movie is an "Elseworlds" Superman, in actuality, it IS Superman. It's the comics that are, to the masses, the "other" Superman. No matter if we like it or not. Just like these movies will be the "real" DC characters. Everything else, like all those Jose Luis Garcia Lopez tumblers and tshirts, will be echoes of something else.
  • Options
    CaptShazamCaptShazam Posts: 1,178
    edited July 2013
    The DC negativity is pretty high right now but those of us unhappy with the company need a place to vent.

    Maybe a thread of DC (or whatever) gripes should be started so that we negative nancys can complain in peace and the positive peters of the world will know to stay away =;
  • Options
    batlawbatlaw Posts: 879
    I agree, If you don't like something don't buy it. However if you love something and they shit on it, you are entitled to say something. Otherwise everybody loses. New coke sucked. It was inferior. They rightly corrected their mistake. DC should do the same.
  • Options
    MattMatt Posts: 4,457
    batlaw said:

    I agree, If you don't like something don't buy it. However if you love something and they shit on it, you are entitled to say something. Otherwise everybody loses. New coke sucked. It was inferior. They rightly corrected their mistake. DC should do the same.

    Maybe when it comes to money, I'm a glass 1/2 full guy. I hope n52 stays the status quo for years to come. I'm hoping the stuff they've done to Batman since the beginning of Morrison's run stays the status quo also. I'm saving money because I don't care for it & won't buy any of the titles. Plain, simple, and easy to move on.

    Once you come to grips with being able to move on, its so much easier to accept the changes.
    M
  • Options
    NickNick Posts: 284

    Nick said:

    If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    Because this isn't a news site. It's a forum board. We react and discuss, and not necessarily for the positive. Not everybody here is pleased with everything that's coming down from the publishers and we need somewhere that we can vent. We need to find out whether or not we're the only ones who feel that way. And sometimes, through the discussions -- not often, but sometimes -- those discussions can help us change our minds or at least find a way that we can live with it. We don't come here simply to roll over and accept the publishers' PR releases like good little puppies. We're here to talk about what we like and what we want to see... and God help the publishers.
    That's completely understandable, and sure everyone needs a place to vent. I'm just saying maybe people don't have to vent in every thead about it, isn't it better to ignore stuff you don't like and use that energy on stuff you DO like?
  • Options
    Chuck_MelvilleChuck_Melville Posts: 3,003
    Nick said:

    Nick said:

    If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    Because this isn't a news site. It's a forum board. We react and discuss, and not necessarily for the positive. Not everybody here is pleased with everything that's coming down from the publishers and we need somewhere that we can vent. We need to find out whether or not we're the only ones who feel that way. And sometimes, through the discussions -- not often, but sometimes -- those discussions can help us change our minds or at least find a way that we can live with it. We don't come here simply to roll over and accept the publishers' PR releases like good little puppies. We're here to talk about what we like and what we want to see... and God help the publishers.
    That's completely understandable, and sure everyone needs a place to vent. I'm just saying maybe people don't have to vent in every thead about it, isn't it better to ignore stuff you don't like and use that energy on stuff you DO like?
    No. I think it's better to use that energy on the stuff you do and don't like.

    I think it's just as important to get on about the stuff that you feel falls short of any mark of quality or expectation rather than sit back, roll over or passively grant it a rubber stamp of approval if you really don't feel that way. And if there's enough negative feedback to actually register on any publisher's consciousness to the extent that they might take steps to make fixes -- which, of course, is never a guarantee -- then all the better.
  • Options
    TorchsongTorchsong Posts: 2,794
    Allow me to be a "Positive Peter" then, and talk about what could work about this as opposed to what couldn't (assuming any of it is true):

    - The first seven or so issues of N52 Justice League would make a great animated movie. Justice League vs. Darkseid. 'Nuff said. You can take all that extra time an animated feature allows to give more exposition, more action, more everything.
    - Consider making stuff out of some of those already canceled properties. Blackhawks sucked as a single issue series, but held its own in trade format, and would like make a nice alterna-GIJoe property. Everyone hates Liefeld on Hawk & Dove, but we don't hate Hawk & Dove. I could see that being a good one-shot. And...of course...bring back the damn Legion!
    - One-shots for Aquaman and Wonder Woman, based on their individual titles. With good animation, not fly by night stuff. Give me the Trench. Give me Black Manta. Show me The Others. Give me Diana fighting the Gods.

    It's very easy to kick DC while they're down, but I won't throw the baby out with the bathwater. There's still a few things they're doing right.
  • Options
    CaptShazamCaptShazam Posts: 1,178
    Torchsong said:


    - Consider making stuff out of some of those already canceled properties. Blackhawks sucked as a single issue series, but held its own in trade format, and would like make a nice alterna-GIJoe property. Everyone hates Liefeld on Hawk & Dove, but we don't hate Hawk & Dove. I could see that being a good one-shot. And...of course...bring back the damn Legion!
    - One-shots for Aquaman and Wonder Woman, based on their individual titles. With good animation, not fly by night stuff.

    I will be positive to your positivity!

    A good Blackhawk series or trade :)
    A non Liefield Hawk & Dove :)
    Aquaman animation =D>
    Wonder Woman animation :x
    Bringing back a good Legion [-O<
  • Options
    Chuck_MelvilleChuck_Melville Posts: 3,003

    A good Blackhawk series or trade :)

    Which Blackhawks?

    The Quality airfighters?
    The DC adventurers?
    The red-and-green clad action heroes?
    The gimmicky super-heroes?
    The Chaykin WWII Socialists?
    The post-Crisis air freighter service?
    Or the New52 mercenary pretenders?
  • Options
    RedRight88RedRight88 Posts: 2,207

    A good Blackhawk series or trade :)

    Which Blackhawks?

    The Quality airfighters?
    The DC adventurers?
    The red-and-green clad action heroes?
    The gimmicky super-heroes?
    The Chaykin WWII Socialists?
    The post-Crisis air freighter service?
    Or the New52 mercenary pretenders?
    The Chicago Ones. :P
  • Options
    Mr_CosmicMr_Cosmic Posts: 3,200
    I have enjoyed Earth 2 and World's Finest..though I doubt they'd animate those.

  • Options
    TorchsongTorchsong Posts: 2,794

    A good Blackhawk series or trade :)

    Which Blackhawks?

    The Quality airfighters?
    The DC adventurers?
    The red-and-green clad action heroes?
    The gimmicky super-heroes?
    The Chaykin WWII Socialists?
    The post-Crisis air freighter service?
    Or the New52 mercenary pretenders?
    That last bunch, presuming we're talking about keeping it New52. I found the trade for dirt cheap (unsurprising) at a store and scooped it up just to see...having been underwhelmed by reading it month-to-month in single issues. It actually read quite well as a trade...the only real failing being a bunch of new people that they didn't bother to establish any real origin for. I think the plan was to develop the origins over time, dropping hints about the backgrounds of Kunoichi, Canada and Irish, as well as Lady Blackhawk herself.

    Of course any animation attempt would be seen as a "poor man's GI Joe" but it'd be fun to see them try it, anyhow.

    Or hell...why not do all of them? Start in the WWII era and show how the Blackhawks have "evolved" over the years. Maybe an aged Lady Blackhawk recounting all her years on the team as she hands the reins over to the "new bunch".
  • Options
    Nick said:

    I'm starting to notice that DC talk is starting to be like Alan Moore talk. People ask Alan Moore all the time about Watchmen, then he gets upset and people get all up in arms over it again and again like it's something new. If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    Might I suggest you get off the FORUMS ( where people DISCUSS things), and just go read DC's press releases on CBR or Newsarama. On a forum, people discuss the good , the bad, the ugly. Positive and negative. It is a "forum" for debate and opinion. Forums are not for news, and no one is calling it a news site.

    If I want to read what DC has to say about the New 52, I will go to their site and read their PR message. If I want to know what PEOPLE think about the New 52, I will come here. There is as much (more, actually) positive as there is negative about the subject here. I am not a fan, but I value and respect the opinions of others.

  • Options
    Chuck_MelvilleChuck_Melville Posts: 3,003
    Mr_Cosmic said:

    I have enjoyed Earth 2 and World's Finest..though I doubt they'd animate those.

    That's too bad. Of all of the New52, those would be the ones I'd watch.
  • Options
    NickNick Posts: 284
    Tonebone said:

    Nick said:

    I'm starting to notice that DC talk is starting to be like Alan Moore talk. People ask Alan Moore all the time about Watchmen, then he gets upset and people get all up in arms over it again and again like it's something new. If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    Might I suggest you get off the FORUMS ( where people DISCUSS things), and just go read DC's press releases on CBR or Newsarama. On a forum, people discuss the good , the bad, the ugly. Positive and negative. It is a "forum" for debate and opinion. Forums are not for news, and no one is calling it a news site.

    If I want to read what DC has to say about the New 52, I will go to their site and read their PR message. If I want to know what PEOPLE think about the New 52, I will come here. There is as much (more, actually) positive as there is negative about the subject here. I am not a fan, but I value and respect the opinions of others.

    So me expressing my opinion is not allowed on your forums, but others can? Sorry didn't know you owned this site. My whole point was if we could not bring up the New 52 hatred in every single thread it would be nice, but I'll get off your forums and let every trash DC in every thread possible because I'm sure the big wigs at Warner Brothers are looking through all our threads seeking advice.
  • Options
    PlaneisPlaneis Posts: 980
    Nick said:

    Tonebone said:

    Nick said:

    I'm starting to notice that DC talk is starting to be like Alan Moore talk. People ask Alan Moore all the time about Watchmen, then he gets upset and people get all up in arms over it again and again like it's something new. If DC is doing New 52 and you don't like it, then ignore it and move on. Why do some people have to keep bringing it up and keep saying "I don't like it! and try to stir things up? Maybe I'm just a cranky nerd, but can't people just report news and stop just trying to rouse everyone and call it news?

    Might I suggest you get off the FORUMS ( where people DISCUSS things), and just go read DC's press releases on CBR or Newsarama. On a forum, people discuss the good , the bad, the ugly. Positive and negative. It is a "forum" for debate and opinion. Forums are not for news, and no one is calling it a news site.

    If I want to read what DC has to say about the New 52, I will go to their site and read their PR message. If I want to know what PEOPLE think about the New 52, I will come here. There is as much (more, actually) positive as there is negative about the subject here. I am not a fan, but I value and respect the opinions of others.

    So me expressing my opinion is not allowed on your forums, but others can? Sorry didn't know you owned this site. My whole point was if we could not bring up the New 52 hatred in every single thread it would be nice, but I'll get off your forums and let every trash DC in every thread possible because I'm sure the big wigs at Warner Brothers are looking through all our threads seeking advice.

    I think what he's saying is, you brought up the idea of why do some people feel the need to complain about DC or the New 52 and why can't they just ignore it. So, what he's saying is that that is kinda what the forums are for. Not JUST that, but forums are a place where people can go go to talk about things. For instance, I can't complain to my wife about the New 52, and I can't really praise them either because she would have no idea what I'm talking about. I mean, i could say something, but it would be a very unsatisfying conversation.

    So, I think what he's saying is the forums are a place for people to vent if they wish. Like, over in the Man of Steel discussion thread there are some people who really did not like the film and others who did. It would be kinda limiting if all the fans just told all the non fans "hey, go away. Ignore the movie if you don't like it. Let us who do like it talk."

  • Options
    batlawbatlaw Posts: 879
    isnt this essentially a new/different subject anyway? Sure it relates to the new52, but this thread is about the direction of the animated universe, not what are your thoughts about the new52. OF COURSE if your opinion of the new52 is negative, odds are youre not going to be pleased the animated DTVs would mimic it. Dont see why anyone with a neg opinion shouldnt be allowed to say so just because they had a similar opinion in a similar thread about a similar topic in the past.
    Besides, where the hell am I supposed to express all my anti new52 views if not here!? They looked at me funny in the supermarket, the bank teller didnt care, and they flagged me as "off topic" on the Future Farmers of America forums.
  • Options
    PeterPeter Posts: 470
    Bullshit. Nick was told to get off the forums. And that's all the difference when it comes to the people Nick is addressing. They 'need' to be heard. They 'need' to vent. And everyone else should fuck off? Bullshit. Negative nancys can't handle not being heard. So much that they MUST. KEEP. POSTING. And it's the same handful of posters in several threads beating the same drum over and over. As Nick said, you bitching on a forum isn't going to change publishers. DC has twitter. DC has Facebook. Grow some balls and join those pages and talk to them directly. Everything else is noise.

    Again - as in the old days, other posters can turn things around. Don't respond to the haters. Post as if you never even read their posts. Turn the discussion to what you want to talk about.

    And might I suggest to CGS: update the Vanilla Forum plugins to include an ignore feature. That'll go a long way to drown out the people making these threads into boring retreads of the same whiiiiiiiiiiining.

    Love and kisses. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.