Home› Comics Talk Community - The On Topic Forum

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register

Categories

Options

DC's new 52 - A success or a predictable, total disaster?

JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
edited March 2012 in Comics Talk Community - The On Topic Forum
I hate everything about the new 52. I've said it for years, if you want to get rich sell erasers to DC Comics. I see a lot of the new ideas are being cancelled. Great. Now that you've forced this upon us, and it failed can we have our old heroes back please? Can we have heroes who remember each other? Can I have my JSA back, please? But, do get Alan Scott back into his old costume, that last one, honestly, what the hell were you folks thinking?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13456

Answers

  • Options
    MiraclemetMiraclemet Posts: 258
    Based on where DC was in total (as the definite #2 publisher consistently behind Marvel), I think they would consider the New 52 to be a success considering a) it resulted in increased sales, that even as they level off are higher than they were before Flashpoint and b)it has definitely increased the DC chatter/interest online.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    tazmaniaktazmaniak Posts: 733
    For me, it was a success.I used to read a lot of DC, but by the time of the relaunch I was only reading/interested in Secret Six.While I hate that my favorite series is gone, I'm now reading 16 DC books.I really hope they don't go back to the previous continuity.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    David_DDavid_D Posts: 3,881
    It's not for me to say at the macro level whether this is a success or not. I guess it depends on how you define it, and what you believe is possible.

    But I can say they have succeeded with me. My DC reading had dropped to nearly zero. And now I am reading six of their books every month (and a seventh in trade, as I was before). Now six may not be a lot of books, but it is a lot more than I was reading before. And with Batman Inc. returning, and some new ones on the way that I will try and potentially stick with, it may soon be more. So I would call that a success.

    Also, the fact that I would even get a bundle (thanks, in part, to the DCBS discount, but still) of a wave of new #1 issues and given them all a chance is a change from before. So even in raising my expectations that these might be titles I will enjoy means they are succeeding with me.

    Of course other readers' experiences will vary, but personally I feel that I gained more than I lost.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    You're all wrong. The correct answer is...it's a disaster. Drastic change for the sake of drastic change and renumbering comics with a #1 issue will always draw in new customers, after all there's a sucker born every minute. But, heroes cannot exist with no past, no context, no history. They have a character they are calling Green Arrow, but this is clearly not Green Arrow. If you want a new comic, write one, with a new character. This Green Arrow is an attempt to show a Smallville type Green Arrow, a corporate CEO, a guy who relies on a team of hi-tech geeks guiding him by an earpiece down dark alleys and telling him which arrow to use. The one with the goatee could do it all by himself. The old Ollie was a Liberal, who chased women, and whose favorite food was chili. He was often the voice of conscience in the JLA, or when teamed up with Batman or Green Lantern. I want him back. The hell with this version.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    David_DDavid_D Posts: 3,881
    edited March 2012
    Oh good. We found a question about subjective things like entertainment and art that has a clear right answer! ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    A Superman who has to wear body armor? S-U-P-E-R-M-A-N has to wear body armor?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WetRatsWetRats Posts: 6,314
    edited March 2012
    You're all wrong.
    Good to know. Thanks for pointing that out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    Well, not being born earlier today, like most DC heroes and their new fans, I can remember Craig Kilborn.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    Lighten up. It's called humor. And my points not only reflect my opinion but they are educational too. Did you know that Green Arrow like chili?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    David_DDavid_D Posts: 3,881
    edited March 2012
    I do think lightening up is good advice.

    You first ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WetRatsWetRats Posts: 6,314
    Well, not being born earlier today, like most DC heroes and their new fans, I can remember Craig Kilborn.
    I remember Craig Kilborn, but I have no idea what you're referring to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WetRatsWetRats Posts: 6,314
    Lighten up. It's called humor. And my points not only reflect my opinion but they are educational too. Did you know that Green Arrow like chili?
    Calling the people who disagree with you "wrong" and "suckers" isn't humor, it's insulting.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    Torchsong gets it. To me this revamp was totally unnecessary, and to add insult to injury, it's not even evenly applied. Aquaman is really the same old character and taken seriously. He's got a good creative team behind him. Green Arrow now is just terrible, and an insult not only to Mike Grell, but to Green Arrrow fans. Okay, here's a question for you should fans be rewarded for their loyalty to a character even if the copyright owner wants to make drastic change? Would you accept a Sherlock Holmes who was a lesbian truck driver from New Jersey who was not a detective? Is that still Sherlock Holmes? I would say NO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    If this NEW 52 Green Arrow was introduced, or referred to as Oliver Queen's son, then it would work for me. As is it doesn't. They've broken the character. Spock has to be a Vulcan with pointy ears. Sherlock Holmes has to be a detective in London. Superman doesn't need body armor. Are you folks getting my point yet? Characters are popular for decades for a reason.
    No one wants the return of Red Superman and Blue Superman, right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WetRatsWetRats Posts: 6,314
    edited March 2012
    @JSA4me, before Ollie was the liberal, skirt-chasing (OK, fishnet-chasing), conscience of the JLA, he was a millionaire with an arrow cave and an arrowcar, and a kid sidekick, and largely indistinguishable from the Batman of the era. Then he lost everything and his character evolved. In one issue

    The new series is starting him fresh and is intended to show the transition from millionaire playboy to crusading liberal over time. Sounds like it could be a good story to me, if they get the right writer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WetRatsWetRats Posts: 6,314
    edited March 2012
    I think the Grell era is the best that character has been. At least, for me.
    For me, it was the Denny O'Neill/Neal Adams Hard-Traveling Heroes version.

    However I also loved the Silver-Age throwback version on the Brave & Bold cartoon.

    There's room for many great versions of a character if well-written.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    Well, not being born earlier today, like most DC heroes and their new fans, I can remember Craig Kilborn.
    I remember Craig Kilborn, but I have no idea what you're referring to.
    Well, clearly you don't. He had a bit called the 5 questions on his Late, Late Show in which he asked guests an obviously subjective question in which the correct answer was Craig's opinion. It often revealed that guests were lying when they said they had seen the show or watched it regularly because if they did then they'd know the bit and know the correct answer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    mwhitt80mwhitt80 Posts: 4,615
    edited March 2012
    Now the latest new version of Green Arrow, to judge by the first two issues, was terrible. But that happens. But he wasn't terrible because he had been one way forever and now changed for the first time. Rather, it was terrible, to me, because the changes this time around weren't good ones. Or, at least, weren't the ones I was interested in.
    David Let's be real here the changes weren't the reason the book was terrible. I believe I will pull a quote from the old forum " I'm not sure anyone will accuse Krul of being a good writer. "
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    DoctorDoomDoctorDoom Posts: 2,586
    I view it as both a success as a whole, but a personal failure.

    The numbers don't lie. And they definitely have people talking about them.

    But for me, who loves buying tons of comics, it's fallen a bit flat. I may be getting less DC then I have been in the past few years. I'm not even getting Superman!

    That being said, I absolutely love the titles I am getting. Who'd have thought I'd ever love a series called "Demon Knights"?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    David_DDavid_D Posts: 3,881
    Now the latest new version of Green Arrow, to judge by the first two issues, was terrible. But that happens. But he wasn't terrible because he had been one way forever and now changed for the first time. Rather, it was terrible, to me, because the changes this time around weren't good ones. Or, at least, weren't the ones I was interested in.
    David Let's be real here the changes weren't the reason the book was terrible. I believe I will pull a quote from the old forum " I'm not sure anyone will accuse Krul of being a good writer. "
    Could be. I am no fan of Krul, but I also would bet the the concept for the New52 Green Arrow included decisions made above his pay grade. So I don't ONLY blame Krul.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    JSA4meJSA4me Posts: 16
    I think the Grell era is the best that character has been. At least, for me.
    For me, it was the Denny O'Neill/Neal Adams Hard-Traveling Heroes version.

    However I also loved the Silver-Age throwback version on the Brave & Bold cartoon.

    There's room for many great versions of a character if well-written.
    Amen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    mwhitt80mwhitt80 Posts: 4,615
    ;) @david_d

    Just stirring the pot
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    David_DDavid_D Posts: 3,881
    Well, not being born earlier today, like most DC heroes and their new fans, I can remember Craig Kilborn.
    I remember Craig Kilborn, but I have no idea what you're referring to.
    Well, clearly you don't. He had a bit called the 5 questions on his Late, Late Show in which he asked guests an obviously subjective question in which the correct answer was Craig's opinion. It often revealed that guests were lying when they said they had seen the show or watched it regularly because if they did then they'd know the bit and know the correct answer.
    I see. When we're talking to you, we should be pretending to be on the Craig Kilborne show.

    You're right-- that should have been obvious.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    WetRatsWetRats Posts: 6,314
    edited March 2012
    Well, clearly you don't. He had a bit called the 5 questions on his Late, Late Show in which he asked guests an obviously subjective question in which the correct answer was Craig's opinion. It often revealed that guests were lying when they said they had seen the show or watched it regularly because if they did then they'd know the bit and know the correct answer.
    Ah yes. Now I remember, from The Daily Show.

    Like most of his bits, it was kind of funny once or twice, but was mostly just mean-spirited bullying masquerading as comedy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BlackUmbrellaBlackUmbrella Posts: 208
    All of these characters have been so reshaped and reworked for so many years that I don't concern myself about it any more. They are like rubber bands that get stretched and twisted, but eventually come back to actual shape in the hands of a writer who gets the essence of the character. All this fretting is crazy.

    You don't like Green Arrow now? Neither does anyone else. Believe me, they'll fix it. Or try to. They want to sell comics.

    I have been reading DC comics for nearly 40 years, so if I wanted to throw a fit over this, I could. When the New 52 hit, economics had already driven me to cancel my pull list and just borrow trades. I was reading nothing new.

    That fresh start was all I needed, and I'm totally back to reading many titles and enjoying comics. I'm loving feeling that 1) I'm in on the ground floor with the characters I enjoy and can feel free to just watch what happens without a tone of baggage, but that 2) My deep knowledge of the DC universe isn't useless.

    I love it. Way to go DC, and I hope Marvel tries the same thing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.